4.4 Article

Probiotics Reduce Gut Microbial Trans location and Improve Adult Atopic Dermatitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 46, 期 9, 页码 S33-S40

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31826a8468

关键词

atopic dermatitis; probiotics; microbiota; T-helper cells; regulatory T cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: It has been suggested that probiotics modulate atopic dermatitis (AD) progression, but no data are actually available on their mechanisms of action and on their ability to act as immuno-modulators in this pathology. Objective: The aim of this randomized double-blinded active treatment versus placebo study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of an intake of a combination of 2 probiotics (Lactobacillus salivarius LS01 and Bifidobacterium breve BR03) for the treatment of adult AD patients. Methods: Forty-eight patients were enrolled in the study (randomization ratio 2:1) and treated with a combination (LS01 and BR03) or placebo (maltodextrin) for 12 weeks. Clinical efficacy was assessed from baseline by changes in the SCORAD index and DLQ index improvement. Analysis on the gut permeability barrier, immunologic parameters, and changes in fecal microbiota and recovery of probiotics were performed at baseline, at the end of therapy, and 2 months later. Results: Patients receiving probiotics showed a significant improvement in clinical parameters (SCORAD, P < 0.0001 and DLQ index, P = 0.021) from baseline. The probiotics reduced microbial translocation (P = 0.050), immune activation (P < 0.001), improved T-helper cell (Th)17/regulatory T cell (Treg) (P = 0.029) and Th1/Th2 (P = 0.028) ratios. None of these changes were observed in the placebo group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that this specific mixture of probiotics (LS01 and BR03 strains) may induce beneficial effects for clinical and immunologic alterations in adult AD. This combination could be considered as adjuvant therapy for the treatment of AD in adult patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据