4.4 Article

The Influence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Its Associated Comorbidities on Liver Transplant Outcomes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 372-378

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181eeaff0

关键词

NAFLD; NASH; liver transplant; outcomes; diabetes

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [T32 DK07634, P30 DK034987]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Goals: To define the influence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its associated comorbidities on liver transplant outcomes. Background: NAFLD cirrhosis is an increasing indication for transplant. The transplant outcomes of NAFLD patients with metabolic syndrome comorbidities remain unclear. Study: We examined a single center, retrospective cohort between 2004 and 2007 to determine transplant mortality for NAFLD and non-NAFLD patients accounting for the possible independent effects of diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and hyperlipidemia. The primary outcomes were 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard ratios were determined controlling for various recipient and donor covariates. Results: In our study, of 118 liver transplants, 18% were performed for NAFLD cirrhosis. Adjusted hazard ratios for death for NAFLD compared with non-NAFLD patients at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years were 8.96 (1.06, 75.8), 1.49 (0.38, 5.81), and 1.05 (0.29, 3.78), respectively. Compared with nondiabetic patients, diabetic patients had hazard ratios at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years of 2.02 (0.31, 12.9), 2.82 (0.94, 8.47), 3.58 (1.32, 9.71), respectively. Obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia did not have a significant impact on posttransplant mortality. Conclusions: We conclude that NAFLD increases 30-day transplant mortality whereas diabetes increases 3-year mortality. Future work should determine the strategies to decrease perioperative mortality among NAFLD patients and ways to improve long-term transplant survival among diabetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据