4.4 Article

Usefulness of Multiple Biomarkers for the Prediction of Significant Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 361-365

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31820d3458

关键词

chronic hepatitis B; liver fibrosis; biomarker

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea [A050021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: It has not been explicitly addressed whether new biomarkers, in addition to readily available clinical data, make a contribution to the prediction of liver fibrosis. Methods: A total of 209 patients with chronic hepatitis B who underwent liver biopsy were recruited. The Clinical Score (CS) model using only routine clinical data and the Biomarker Score (BS) model using 7 putative biomarkers were derived from the derivation set (n = 105), and these models were applied to a separate patients group (n = 104) to investigate whether the addition of BS improved the diagnostic accuracy in predicting significant fibrosis beyond an assessment based solely on CS. Results: The most informative biomarkers for predicting significant fibrosis were hyaluronic acid and matrix metalloproteinase-2. The BS was an independent predictive factor for significant fibrosis even after accounting for CS in both sets. Among the derivation set, the incorporation of the BS into the CS model did not significantly increase the receiver operating characteristic area, with only a small improvement of about 2% (P = 0.11). Similarly, in the validation set, a combined model with CS and BS showed no superior diagnostic accuracy over the CS model alone, with an improvement of approximately 2% [0.83 (0.75 to 0.92) vs. 0.81 (0.70 to 0.91); P = 0.16]. Conclusions: The simultaneous addition of several biomarkers adds only modestly to clinical predictive factors for risk assessment of individual patients. These results highlight the need for the models to be validated in another cohort with a broader distribution of fibrosis severity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据