4.4 Article

Long-term Prognosis of Combined Hepatocellular and Cholangiocarcinoma After Curative Resection Comparison With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 69-75

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181ce5dfa

关键词

combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma; hepatocellular carcinoma; cholangiocarcinoma; curative resection; prognosis

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2009-0087452]
  2. Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea [0920280]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Goal: In this study, we attempted to evaluate the prognosis of combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) with comparison to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CC). Background: The prognosis of cHCC-CC has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the prognosis of cHCC-CC with comparison to HCC and CC. Study: Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for cHCC-CC at a single tertiary care center in Korea and their age, sex, and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class matched HCC and CC patients were included. We evaluated time-to-recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) of cHCC-CC cases and compared them with HCC and CC patients. Results: Thirty cHCC-CC, 60 HCC, and 60CC patients were included. For cHCC-CC group, the median TTR and OS were 5.4 and 18.0 months. After adjustment for confounding factors, the cHCC-CC group had a shorter TTR than did HCC group [relative risk (RR), 2.76; P < 0.001] and CC group (RR, 2.00; P = 0.013), and a shorter OS than HCC group (RR, 4.70; P < 0.001). Compared with the each stage I diseases, cHCC-CC had shorter TTR than HCC (RR, 4.59; P = 0.001) and CC (RR, 2.74, P = 0.015) and shorter OS than HCC (RR, 9.35; P = 0.001). Conclusions: The results of this study indicated that cHCC-CC had a significantly poorer prognosis than HCC and CC even after curative resection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据