4.4 Article

A Combination of Rifaximin and Neomycin Is Most Effective in Treating Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients With Methane on Lactulose Breath Test

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 44, 期 8, 页码 547-550

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181c64c90

关键词

IBS; methane; constipation; antibiotics

资金

  1. Salix Pharmaceuticals
  2. Beatrice and Samuel A. Seaver Foundation
  3. Prometheus Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: There is a growing interest in methane and its association with constipation in functional bowel disease. Neomycin-based treatment of methane-positive subjects has resulted in improvement of constipation. Rifaximin, although superior for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome compared with other antibiotics, seems less effective in methane-positive subjects. In this study, we evaluate 3 different antibiotic treatments in patients who have a methane-positive breath test: rifaximin only, neomycin only, and the combination of neomycin and rifaximin. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with methane on their lactulose breath test (>= 3 ppm of methane) who received one of the following antibiotic treatments: 500 mg b.i.d. for 10 days of neomycin alone, 400 mg t.i.d. for 10 days of rifaximin alone, or a combination of both rifaximin and neomycin for 10 days. All patients must have received antibiotic treatment after their initial consultation at the medical center and, in addition, had at least 1 follow-up to evaluate the effects of the treatment. After inclusion/exclusion criteria were met, all charts were evaluated to determine if the subject was a responder to the antibiotic therapy. This included clinical symptom improvement and eradication of methane on their breath test. Results: Of the subjects receiving the treatment of rifaximin and neomycin (n = 27), 85% had a clinical response, compared with 63% of subjects in the neomycin only group (n = 8) (P = 0.15) and 56% of subjects in the rifaximin only group (n = 39) (P = 0.01). When comparing the neomycin group with the rifaximin group, the difference was nonsignificant. When evaluating methane eradication results, 87% of subjects taking the rifaximin and neomycin combination eradicated the methane on their breath test. This is compared with 33% of subjects in the neomycin group that eradicated the methane (P = 0.001), and only 28% of subjects in the rifaximin group (P = 0.001). Of the patients who did not eliminate the methane with only rifaximin treatment, 66% of those who subsequently used the rifaximin and neomycin treatment were able to normalize their breath test. Conclusions: The combination of rifaximin and neomycin is more effective in treating methane-producing subjects-in both clinical response and methane elimination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据