4.4 Article

Long-term follow-up of the endoscopic treatment of strictures in pediatric and adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 42, 期 8, 页码 880-885

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181354440

关键词

inflammatory bowel disease; strictures; endoscopy; dilation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Strictures are a common complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and are usually treated by Surgical resection or strictureplasty. As an alternative to Surgery, endoscopic balloon dilation and steroid injection have been used to relieve symptoms. Goals: To assess patient or stricture characteristics that may predict a better outcome and duration of response as endoscopic therapy is not Without its risks. Study: A retrospective review of patients with IBD strictures who underwent dilations between 1996 and 2005 was performed. The patients were followed in the adult and pediatric IBD clinics at a single center. Information was collected from medical records. Results: Strictures were identified in the small and large bowel of 24 patients (22 adult and 2 pediatric). The majority had Crolln's disease (22/24). In total, 71 dilations were performed on 29 strictures 46 dilations for 17 strictures were augmented with triamcinolone. Mean duration of follow-up was 32 months. This Study included 1 stomal, 12 anastomotic. and 16 de novo strictures. Of 12 anastomotic strictures, 6 were complex. Endoscopic dilation was uneventful in 22/24 patients. Bleeding and perforation Occurred on separate occasions in 1/6 complex stricture patients and rupture of a paracolonic abscess in another patient with a de novo sigmoid stricture. Surgery was performed on 2 patients, 1 for refractory disease and I for noncompliance with therapy. Conclusions: Endoscopic dilation can provide long-term effective palliation of symptoms with minimal risk in patients with simple strictures. Complex anastomotic strictures arc technically more challenging compared with de novo strictures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据