4.6 Article

GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 64, 期 4, 页码 401-406

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015

关键词

Quality assessment; Body of evidence; Imprecision; Indirectness; Inconsistency; Publication bias

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces the approach of GRADE to rating quality of evidence. GRADE specifies four categories high, moderate, low, and very low that are applied to a body of evidence, not to individual studies. In the context of a systematic review, quality reflects our confidence that the estimates of the effect are correct. In the context of recommendations, quality reflects our confidence that the effect estimates are adequate to support a particular recommendation. Randomized trials begin as high-quality evidence, observational studies as low quality. Quality as used in GRADE means more than risk of bias and so may also be compromised by imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness of study results, and publication bias. In addition, several factors can increase our confidence in an estimate of effect. GRADE provides a systematic approach for considering and reporting each of these factors. GRADE separates the process of assessing quality of evidence from the process of making recommendations. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation depend on more than just the quality of evidence. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据