4.6 Article

GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 64, 期 4, 页码 395-400

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012

关键词

GRADE; PICO; Patient-important outcomes; Surrogate; Guideline development; Quality of evidence; Indirectness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GRADE requires a clear specification of the relevant setting, population, intervention, and comparator. It also requires specification of all important outcomes whether evidence from research studies is, or is not, available. For a particular management question, the population, intervention, and outcome should be sufficiently similar across studies that a similar magnitude of effect is plausible. Guideline developers should specify the relative importance of the outcomes before gathering the evidence and again when evidence summaries are complete. In considering the importance of a surrogate outcome, authors should rate the importance of the patient-important outcome for which the surrogate is a substitute and subsequently rate down the quality of evidence for indirectness of outcome. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据