4.6 Article

Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 64, 期 3, 页码 250-254

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.014

关键词

Adherence; Compliance; Psychometrics; Latent variable; Measurement; self-reports

资金

  1. National Institute of Aging [R21AG035233]
  2. Research Career Scientist award (RCS) [10-391]
  3. Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Durham, NC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Medication nonadherence is a significant clinical problem in chronic disease management. Self-report measures have inadequate reliability and poor distributional properties. We demonstrate how two fundamental measurement issues have limited the usefulness of self-reported medication nonadherence measures and offer recommendations for improving measurement. Study Design and Methods: We reviewed existing self-report measures of medication nonadherence in the context of hypertension, one of the most common chronic conditions in which medication nonadherence is a paramount concern. We evaluated these measures with regard to two issues: (1) conflation of causal indicators (which give rise to a latent construct) and effect indicators (which are determined by a latent construct), and (2) a lack of evidence regarding the stability of nonadherence over time. Results: Nonadherence measurement could be improved by using effect indicators to assess the extent of nonadherence and causal indicators to assess reasons for nonadherence. Moreover, nonadherence should be assessed longitudinally, so that recent developments in statistical modeling can illuminate the extent to which medication nonadherence is transient vs. stable. Conclusion: Attention to these measurement issues can improve the assessment of self-reported nonadherence, thereby allowing more accurate conclusions to be drawn about medication-taking behavior and informing the development of improved interventions that target medication nonadherence. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据