4.6 Article

Good agreement between parental and self-completed questionnaires about allergic diseases and environmental factors in teenagers

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 63, 期 7, 页码 783-789

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.017

关键词

Agreement; Eczema; Parents; Questionnaires; Rhinitis; Teenager

资金

  1. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation
  2. Swedish Foundation for Health Care Science and Allergy Research (Vardal)
  3. Swedish Asthma-Allergy Foundation
  4. U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To study whether the methodological change from parent to index subject as questionnaire respondent affected the prevalence estimates and risk factor patterns for allergic diseases in a longitudinal study. Study Design and Setting: A prospective study of asthma and allergic diseases among children was begun in 1996 within the Obstructive Lung Disease in Northern Sweden Study. In 2002, about 3,342 (95% of invited) teenagers (13 to 14 years) completed the annual questionnaire. A random sample of 294 (84% of invited) parents also completed the same extended International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire. Skin prick tests were performed in 1996 and 2000. Results: There were no significant differences in the prevalence of rhinitis, eczema, or related environmental factors between parental and self-reports, except for the question of having a dog at home. The absolute agreement was high, whereas the kappa values were fair or moderate. Kappa values of questions regarding parental smoking were 0.8-0.9. Allergic sensitization was the major risk factor for both rhinitis and eczema, and the odds ratios were similar regardless of who reported the condition. Conclusion: The agreement between the parental and teenagers' reports was good, and the methodological change did not affect the study results. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据