4.7 Article

Denosumab for Treatment of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 99, 期 9, 页码 3144-3152

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-1001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Amgen Inc.
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [P30CA01662]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) in patients with advanced cancer is often caused by excessive osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. Patients may not respond to or may relapse after iv bisphosphonate therapy. Objective: We investigated whether denosumab, a potent inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, reduces serum calcium in patients with bisphosphonate-refractory HCM. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-arm international study, participants had serum calcium levels corrected for albumin (CSC) > 12.5 mg/dL (3.1 mmol/L) despite bisphosphonates given >7 and <= 30 days before screening. Intervention: Patients received 120 mg sc denosumab on days 1, 8, 15, and 29 and then every 4 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with CSC <= 11.5 mg/dL (2.9 mmol/L) (response) by day 10. Secondary endpoints included response by visit, duration of response, and the proportion of patients with a complete response (CSC <= 10.8 mg/dL [2.7 mmol/L]) by day 10 and during the study. Results: Patients (N = 33) had solid tumors or hematologic malignancies. By day 10, 21 patients (64%) reached CSC <= 11.5 mg/dL, and 12 patients (33%) reached CSC <= 10.8 mg/dL. During the study, 23 patients (70%) reached CSC <= 11.5 mg/dL, and 21 patients (64%) reached CSC <= 10.8 mg/dL. Estimated median response duration was 104 days. The most common serious adverse events were hypercalcemia worsening (5 patients, 15%) and dyspnea (3 patients, 9%). Conclusions: In patients with HCM despite recent iv bisphosphonate treatment, denosumab lowered serum calcium in 64% of patients within 10 days, inducing durable responses. Denosumab may offer a new treatment option for HCM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据