4.7 Article

Hypoxemia and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Extreme Obesity

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 99, 期 9, 页码 E1650-E1654

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-1260

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  2. Allergan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been shown to be associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Studies on healthy individuals found that OSA is associated with lower insulin sensitivity. We hypothesized that nocturnal hypoxemia from OSA is associated with poorer glycemia in severely obese DM individuals. Design and Setting: This was a retrospective observational study of 122 non-DM, 126 non-insulin-treated DM, and 35 insulin-treated DM patients. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, body mass index, and comorbidities. An overnight sleep study was performed in all patients, and OSA was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index of >= 5 events/h. Results: There were more males (P = .003) and a lower proportion of white Europeans (P = .010) among DM patients. The prevalence of OSA was 80.1% in DM and 63.1% in non-DM individuals (P = .001). DM individuals also had lower oxygen saturation (O-2) (P = .0106), greater percentage of time spent under 90% oxygen saturation (%TST<90%) (P = .0067), and higher apnea-hypopnea index (P = .0085). Regression analysis showed that %TST<90% and minimum O-2 saturations were associated with worse hemoglobin A(1c) results among DM individuals. Every 10% reduction in minimum O-2 was associated with a 0.3% increase in HbA(1c), where as a 10% increase in %TST<90% was associated with a 0.2% increase in hemoglobin A(1c) after adjusting for a range of potential confounders. Conclusion: The high OSA prevalence in DM individuals and a positive relationship between nocturnal hypoxemia and glycemia supports the need to assess correction of hypoxemia as a management strategy for glycemic control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据