4.7 Review

Toll-like Receptor Status in Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome: A Translational Perspective

期刊

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-3092

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Diabetes Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: The prevalence of both obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) is increasing at alarming rates globally. Both predispose to diabetes, cardiovascular disease, fatty liver disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and certain cancers. Understanding the mechanisms contributing to increased cardiometabolic risk in obesity and MetS is of utmost importance. Evidence Acquisition: For this review, we performed a detailed literature search on PubMed of all publications related to Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and obesity and MetS for the last 20 years. Evidence Synthesis: The TLRs are well-characterized immune receptors that enhance inflammation. The recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns and endogenous (host-derived) ligands released by various cell types triggers activation and expression of TLRs. TLRs, especially TLR2 and TLR4, induce insulin resistance, which is pivotal in the pathogenesis of obesity and MetS. Both obesity and MetS are characterized by low-grade chronic inflammation, possibly triggered by activation of TLR2 and TLR4. TLRs, especially TLR4, are activated by fatty acids and endotoxinemia (a marker of gut permeability), features of both obesity and MetS, resulting in activation of nuclear factor-kappa B and increased release of inflammatory biomediators such as IL-6, IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1, which play a role in the pathophysiology of obesity and MetS. Reduction of calories, exercise, and nutraceutical and pharmacological agents can modulate TLRs. Conclusions: In this review, we present evidence for a pivotal role of TLR-induced inflammation in both obesity and MetS and speculate that targeting these TLRs can forestall their adverse sequelae of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据