4.7 Article

Medical Treatment of Cushing's Disease

期刊

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2012-3126

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Cushing's disease (CD) is associated with serious morbidity and, when suboptimally treated, an increased mortality. Although surgery is the first-line treatment modality for CD, hypercortisolism persists or recurs in an important subset of patients. Considering the deleterious effects of uncontrolled CD, there is a clear need for effective medical therapy. Objective: In this review, wediscuss molecular targets for medical therapy, efficacy, and side effects of the currently used drugs to treat hypercortisolism and focus on recent developments resulting from translational and clinical studies. Evidence Acquisition: Selection of publications related to the study objective was performed via a PubMed search using relevant keywords and search terms. Main Findings: Medical therapy for CD can be classified into pituitary-directed, adrenal-blocking, and glucocorticoid receptor-antagonizing drugs. Recent studies demonstrate that somatostatin receptor subtype 5 (sst(5)) and dopamine receptor subtype 2 (D-2) are frequently (co-) expressed by corticotroph adenomas. Pituitary-directed therapy with pasireotide and cabergoline, targeting sst(5) and D-2, respectively, is successful in approximately 25-30% of patients. Adrenal-blocking drugs can be effective by inhibiting steroidogenic enzyme activity. Finally, the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone induces clinical and metabolic improvement in the majority of patients. Each drug can have important side effects that may impair long-term treatment. Generally, patients with moderate to severe hypercortisolism need combination therapy to normalize cortisol production. Conclusion: Medical therapy for CD can be targeted at different levels and should be tailored in each individual patient. Future studies should examine the optimal dose and combination of medical treatment modalities for CD. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: 425-438, 2013)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据