4.7 Article

Isolated GH Deficiency due to a GHRH Receptor Mutation Causes Hip Joint Problems and Genu Valgum, and Reduces Size but not Density of Trabecular and Mixed Bone

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 98, 期 11, 页码 E1710-E1715

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-2349

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: The GH/IGF-I axis is important for bone growth, but its effects on joint function are not completely understood. Adult-onset GH-deficient individuals have often reduced bone mineral density (BMD). However, there are limited data on BMD in adult patients with untreated congenital isolated GH-deficient (IGHD). We have shown that adult IGHD individuals from the Itabaianinha, homozygous for the c.57 + 1G>A GHRHR mutation, have reduced bone stiffness, but BMD and joint status in this cohort are unknown. Objective: The goal is to study BMD, joint function, and osteoarthritis score in previously untreated IGHD adults harboring the c.57 + 1G>A GHRHR mutation. Design: This is a cross-sectional study. Methods: Areal BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was measured in 25 IGHD and 23 controls (CO). Volumetric BMD (vBMD) was calculated at the lumbar spine and total hip. Joint function was assessed by goniometry of elbow, hips, and knees. X-rays were used to measure the anatomic axis of knee and the severity of osteoarthritis, using a classification for osteophytes (OP) and joint space narrowing (JSN). Results: Genu valgum was more prevalent in IGHD than CO. The osteoarthritis knees OP score was similar in both groups, and knees JSN score showed a trend to be higher in IGHD. The hips OP score and JSN score were higher in IGHD. Areal BMD was lower in IGHD than CO, but vBMD was similar in the two groups. Range of motion was similar in elbow, knee, and hip in IGHD and CO. Conclusions: Untreated congenital IGHD due to a GHRHR mutation causes hip joint problems and genu valgum, without apparent clinical significance, reduces bone size, but does not reduce vBMD of the lumbar spine and hip.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据