4.7 Article

Association of Circulating Sclerostin Levels with Fat Mass and Metabolic Disease-Related Markers in Japanese Postmenopausal Women

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 97, 期 8, 页码 E1473-E1477

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2012-1218

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, Welfare
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Ministry of Culture, Education, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  4. Japan Anti-Aging Foundation
  5. Japan Osteoporosis Foundation
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24659126, 23249040] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is related to the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, diabetes, and metabolic diseases. Sclerostin is an inhibitor of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. However, there are few data regarding the relationship between sclerostin levels and metabolic disease. Objective: This study aimed to identify the relationship between serum sclerostin levels, body composition markers, and the markers of metabolic disease. Design, Setting, and Patients: The present study is a cross-sectional study. We measured serum sclerostin levels in 352 Japanese postmenopausal women and analyzed the relationship of these levels with bone mineral density, abdominal fat mass, and biochemical markers. The mean (SD) age of the subjects was 65.5 (9.3) yr. Results: Serum sclerostin levels were positively correlated with percentages of abdominal and gynoid fat. We also analyzed the association between serum sclerostin levels and biochemical markers related to metabolic diseases. Multivariate analysis revealed that the serum sclerostin levels were significantly correlated with the levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and homocysteine. Conclusions: The circulating sclerostin levels were associated with fat mass. The circulating sclerostin levels were also correlated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and homocysteine. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97: E1473-E1477, 2012)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据