4.7 Article

Permanent Hypopituitarism Is Rare after Structural Traumatic Brain Injury in Early Childhood

期刊

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-2284

关键词

-

资金

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand
  2. Australasian Pediatric Endocrine Group
  3. Starship Fellowship Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Wesought to determine the incidence of permanent hypopituitarism in a potentially high-risk group: young children after structural traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study with longitudinal follow-up. Dynamic tests of pituitary function (GH and ACTH) were performed in all subjects and potential abnormalities critically evaluated. Puberty was clinically staged; baseline thyroid function, prolactin, IGF-I, serum sodium, and osmolality were compared with age-matched data. Diagnosis of GH deficiency was based on an integrated assessment of stimulated GH peak (<5 mu g/liter suggestive of deficiency), IGF-I, and growth pattern. ACTH deficiency was diagnosed based on a subnormal response to two serial Synacthen tests (peak cortisol <500 nmol/liter) and a metyrapone test. Results: We studied 198 survivors of structural TBI sustained in early childhood (112 male, age at injury 1.7 +/- 1.5 yr) 6.5 +/- 3.2 yr after injury. Sixty-four of the injuries (33%) were inflicted and 134 (68%) accidental. Two participants had developed precocious puberty, which is within the expected background population rate. Peak stimulated GH was subnormal in 16 participants (8%), in the context of normal IGF-I and normal growth. Stimulated peak cortisol was low in 17 (8%), but all had normal ACTH function on follow-up. One participant had a transient low serum T-4. Therefore, no cases of hypopituitarism were recorded. Conclusion: Permanenthypopituitarism is rare after both inflicted and accidental structural TBI in early childhood. Precocious puberty was the only pituitary hormone abnormality found, but the prevalence did not exceed that of the normal population. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97: 599-604, 2012)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据