4.7 Review

Risk Factors for Low Bone Mass-Related Fractures in Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 97, 期 6, 页码 1861-1870

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-3058

关键词

-

资金

  1. The Endocrine Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Testing men at increased risk for osteoporotic fractures has been recommended. Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the magnitude of association and quality of supporting evidence linking multiple risk factors with low bone mass-related fractures in men. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and Cochrane CENTRAL through February 2010. We identified further studies by reviewing reference lists from selected studies and reviews. Study Selection: Eligible studies had to enroll men and quantitatively evaluate the association of risk factors with low bone density-related fractures. Data Extraction: Reviewers working independently and in duplicate determined study eligibility and extracted study description, quality, and outcome data. Data Synthesis: Fifty-five studies provided data sufficient for meta-analysis. The quality of these observational studies was moderate with fair levels of multivariable adjustment and adequate exposure and outcome ascertainment. Statistically significant associations were established for age, low body mass index, current smoking, excessive alcohol use, chronic corticosteroid use, history of prior fractures, history of falls, history of hypogonadism, history of stroke, and history of diabetes. Statistical heterogeneity of the meta-analytic estimates of all associations was significant except for chronic corticosteroid use. None of these associations were of large magnitude (i.e. adjusted odds ratios were generally < 2). No evidence supporting a particular effective testing or screening strategy was identified. Conclusions: Multiple risk factors for fractures in men were identified, but their usefulness for stratifying and selecting men for bone density testing remains uncertain. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97: 1861-1870, 2012)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据