4.7 Article

A Novel Tool in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of (Cyclic) Cushing's Syndrome: Measurement of Long-Term Cortisol in Scalp Hair

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 97, 期 10, 页码 E1836-E1843

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2012-1852

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [916.96.069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Measurement of cortisol in 24-h urine collections and midnight saliva are standard screening tests for Cushing's syndrome (CS). These tests reflect cortisol levels during a maximum of 24 h and do not provide historical information. Therefore, they can yield normal results in case of cyclic CS, which is a rare disorder that is characterized by alternating episodes of endogenous cortisol excess and normal cortisol secretion. The measurement of cortisol in scalp hair is a novel tool that might be helpful to establish the diagnosis of (cyclic) CS. Our aim was to study whether hair cortisol timelines correspond with clinical course in patients with CS and whether we could create retrospective timelines of cortisol exposure that correspond with symptomatic periods in patients suspected of cyclic CS. Methods: Scalp hair was collected in 14 patients with confirmed CS and six patients suspected of cyclic CS. Cortisol was extracted from the hair samples with methanol, and an ELISA was used to measure cortisol levels in hair extracts. A group of 96 nonobese individuals were used as a control group. Results: Hair cortisol levels were significantly elevated in CS patients (P < 0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity of hair cortisol measurements for CS were 86 and 98%, respectively. Hair cortisol timelines of patients with CS and cyclic CS corresponded with clinical course. Conclusion: Hair samples can provide a historical timeline that corresponds with clinical course in patients with (cyclic) CS. This new diagnostic tool can contribute significantly to early recognition of patients suffering from cyclic CS. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97: E1836-E1843, 2012)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据