4.7 Article

MiR-1 Is a Tumor Suppressor in Thyroid Carcinogenesis Targeting CCND2, CXCR4, and SDF-1α

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 96, 期 9, 页码 E1388-E1398

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-0345

关键词

-

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Micro-RNA have emerged as an important class of short endogenous RNA that act as posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression and are constantly deregulated inhumancancer. MiR-1 has been found down-regulated in lung, colon, and prostate cancer. Objectives: In this study, we investigated the possible role of miR-1 in thyroid carcinogenesis. Design: We have analyzed miR-1 expression in a panel of thyroid neoplasias including benign and malignant lesions and searched for miR-1 targets. Results: Our results show that miR-1 expression is drastically down-regulated in thyroid adenomas and carcinomas in comparison with normal thyroid tissue. Interestingly, miR-1 down-regulation was also found in thyroid hyperproliferative nonneoplastic lesions such as goiters. We identified the CCND2, coding for the cyclin D2 (CCND2) protein that favors the G1/S transition, CXCR4, and SDF-1 alpha genes, coding for the receptor for the stromal cell derived factor-1 (SDF-1)/CXCL12 chemokine and its ligand SDF-1/CXCL12, respectively, as miR-1 targets. An inverse correlation was found between miR-1 expression and CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and SDF-1 alpha protein levels in papillary and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas. Consistent with a role of the CCND2 protein in cell proliferation and CXCR4 and SDF-1 alpha proteins in cell invasion and metastasis, functional studies demonstrate that miR-1 is able to inhibit thyroid carcinoma cell proliferation and migration. Conclusions: These results indicate the involvement of miR-1 in thyroid cell proliferation and migration, validating a role of miR-1 down-regulation in thyroid carcinogenesis. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96: E1388-E1398, 2011)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据