4.7 Article

Differences in Insulin Resistance in Mexican and U.S. Pima Indians with Normal Glucose Tolerance

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 95, 期 11, 页码 E358-E362

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2010-0297

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Insulin resistance is a major risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians, a population with the highest prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the world. Their Mexican counterpart, living a traditional lifestyle in the mountains of Sonora, have at least 5 times less diabetes than the U. S. Pima Indians. Objective: We evaluated whether Mexican Pima Indians had lower insulin resistance than U. S. Pima Indians. Design and Patients: We compared fasting insulin and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in 194 Mexican Pima Indians (100 females, 94 males) and 449 U. S. Pima Indians (246 females, 203 males) with normal glucose tolerance from a cross-sectional study. Adjusted differences of log-transformed outcomes (fasting insulin and HOMA-IR) between groups were evaluated using multiple linear regression models and paired t test in a matched subset. Results: Unadjusted fasting insulin and HOMA-IR were much lower in the Mexican Pima Indians than in their U. S. counterparts. After adjusting by obesity, age, and sex, mean (95% confidence interval) for fasting insulin was 6.22 (5.34-7.24) vs. 13.56 mu U/ml (12.27-14.97) and for HOMA-IR 1.40 (1.20-1.64) vs. 3.07 (2.77-3.40), respectively, for Mexican Pima and U. S. Pima Indians. Results were confirmed in subset matched for age, sex, and body fat. Conclusion: Our results indicate that Mexican Pima Indians have lower insulin resistance in comparison with their genetically related U. S. counterparts, even after controlling for differences in obesity, age, and sex. This finding underscores the importance of lifestyle factors as protecting factors against insulin resistance in individuals with a high propensity to develop diabetes. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95: E358-E362, 2010)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据