4.7 Review

Adult Height in Patients with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 95, 期 9, 页码 4161-4172

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2009-2616

关键词

-

资金

  1. The Endocrine Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Treatment for patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) may affect the final height of these patients. Objective: Our objective was to determine the distribution of achieved height in patients with classic CAH diagnosed at infancy or early childhood and treated with glucocorticoids. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus through September 2008; the reference sections of included studies; and expert files. Study Selection: Eligible studies included patients diagnosed with CAH before age 5 and followed to final height. Data Extraction: Reviewers working in duplicate independently extracted data on study characteristics and outcomes and determined each study's risk of bias. Data Synthesis: The SD score (SDS) for final height and corrected height (defined as final height SDS - midparental height SDS) were estimated from each study and pooled using random-effects metaanalysis. The I-2 statistic was used to assess inconsistency in results across studies. Results: We found 35 eligible studies, most of which were retrospective single-cohort studies. The final height SDS achieved by CAH patients was -1.38 (-1.56 to -1.20; I-2 = 90.2%), and the corrected height SDS was -1.03 (-1.20 to -0.86; I-2 = 63.1%). This was not significantly associated with age at diagnosis, gender, type and dose of steroid, and age of onset of puberty. Mineralocorticoid users had a better height outcome in comparison with the nonusers (P = 0.02). Conclusion: Evidence derived from observational studies suggests that the final height of CAH patients treated with glucocorticoids is lower than the population norm and is lower than expected given parental height. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95: 4161-4172, 2010)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据