4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop

期刊

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-1758

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a common clinical problem. The purpose of this report is to guide the use of diagnostic tests for this condition in clinical practice. Participants: Interested professional societies selected a representative for the consensus committee and provided funding for a one-day meeting. A subgroup of this committee set the program and developed key questions for review. Consensus was established at a closed meeting that followed. The conclusions were then circulated to the participating professional societies. Evidence: Each question was addressed by a relevant literature search (on PubMed), and the data were presented for discussion at the group meeting. Consensus Process: Consensus was achieved by a group meeting. Statements were prepared by all authors, with comments relating to accuracy from the diagnosis subgroup and by representatives from the participating professional societies. Conclusions: We conclude that: 1) reference ranges should be established for serum PTH in vitamin D-replete healthy individuals; 2) second-and third-generation PTH assays are both helpful in the diagnosis of PHPT; 3) DNA sequence testing can be useful in familial hyperparathyroidism or hypercalcemia; 4) normocalcemic PHPT is a variant of the more common presentation of PHPT with hypercalcemia; 5) serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels should be measured and, if vitamin D insufficiency is present, it should be treated as part of any management course; and 6) the estimated glomerular filtration rate should be used to determine the level of kidney function in PHPT: an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 ml/min . 1.73 m(2) should be a benchmark for decisions about surgery in established asymptomatic PHPT. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94: 340-350, 2009)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据