4.7 Article

Placental expression of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 is increased in singletons and twin pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction

期刊

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2007-1042

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is characterized by decreased placental perfusion. Low oxygen has been shown to increase soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) expression in the human placenta. The objective of this study was to examine sFlt-1 expression in different types of IUGR pregnancies, including early-onset severe cases characterized by abnormal umbilical and uterine artery Doppler and discordant IUGR twins in which the normal cotwin represents the optimal control because both placentas share the same uterine environment. Patients: Placentas from four subgroups were collected: early severe IUGR with umbilical artery absent end diastolic flow (n = 19), small for gestational age with normal uterine and umbilical artery Doppler (n = 11), severely growth-restricted dichorionic and monochorionic twins with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler (n = 9), preeclamptic twins (n = 3), and age-matched normal singletons (n = 19) and twin controls (n = 8). Results: Expression of sFlt-1 mRNA and protein was significantly increased in IUGR placentas compared with small for gestational age and normal control placentas. sFlt-1 expression levels were also significantly greater in the small IUGR twin placentas from discordant twin pregnancies compared with the normal cotwin. In preeclamptic twins, sFlt-1 expression was increased in only one of the two placentas. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that sFlt-1 expression is increased in severe IUGR placentas with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler of singletons and also in discordant IUGR twins. Reduced placental perfusion may contribute to the increased expression of sFlt-1 in IUGR pregnancies. Our data are compatible with differential sFlt-1 expression in placentas from discordant twins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据