4.7 Article

Serial assessment of serum bone metabolism markers identifies women with the highest rate of bone loss and osteoporosis risk

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 93, 期 7, 页码 2622-2632

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2007-1508

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: One of the important challenges in the management of osteoporosis is to identify women who are at high risk of developing osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Objective: Our objective was to evaluate whether assessment of bone metabolism at multiple occasions can identify women with the highest risk for bone loss. Design: The Malmo Osteoporosis Prospective Risk Assessment study is an ongoing longitudinal study. Participants have been evaluated at baseline and after 1, 3, and 5 yr. Setting: We conducted a population-based study. Participants: Participants included 1044 women, all 75 yr old at baseline. Main Outcome Measures: Seven bone turnover markers were assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 5 yr (n = 573). The 5-yr change in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was also determined. Results: Baseline markers correlated weakly to change in total body aBMD. The associations were more pronounced when the average of the baseline and 1-yr measurements was used (standardized regression coefficients -0.12 to -0.23, P < 0.01). Adding the 3-yr and 5-yr measurement further strengthened the correlation (regression coefficients up to -0.30, P < 0.001). Women with constantly high turnover lost significantly more bone at total body assessment (-2.6%) than women with intermediate (-1.6%) or low turnover (-0.2%, P for trend < 0.001). They also had a greater decrease in hip BMD (-8.3, -6.0, and -5.1%, respectively, P = 0.010). Results were similar also in the subgroup of women with osteopenia. Conclusions: Our results suggest that serial assessment of bone turnover improves the identification of women with the highest rate of bone loss and osteoporosis risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据