4.7 Article

Regulation of ovarian cancer cell viability and sensitivity to cisplatin by progesterone receptor membrane component-1

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 93, 期 5, 页码 1592-1599

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2007-2771

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Progesterone (P4) influences ovarian cancer cells by an unknown mechanism. Objective: The objective was to determine whether P4 acts through progesterone receptor membrane component-1 (PGRMC1) in ovarian cancers. Design, Setting and Patients: Archival tissue and cDNA provided by OriGene were used for expression studies. In vitro experiments were conducted with Ovcar-3 cells. Main Outcome Measures: PCR, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry were used to measure expression of PGRMC1 and nuclear progesterone receptor (PGR). PGRMC1's role in regulating the viability of ovarian cancers was assessed by over expressing PGRMC1, depleting PGRMC1 using small interfering RNA, and attenuating PGRMC1's action with a blocking antibody. Apoptosis was determined by 4', 6'-diamino-2-phenylindole staining. Results: PGRMC1 mRNA increased and PGR mRNA decreased in advanced stages of ovarian cancer. Unlike PGR, PGRMC1 was expressed in virtually every cancer cell within the tumor. A similar relationship between PGRMC1 and PGR was observed in Ovcar-3 cells. In these cells P4 suppressed apoptosis induced by either serum withdrawal or cisplatin (CDDP). Moreover, in the presence of P4, the following occurs: 1) overexpression of PGRMC1 reduces the effectiveness of CDDP, 2) depletion of PGRMC1 with small interfering RNA enhances the effects of CDDP, and 3) PGRMC1 antibody treatment increases the apoptotic response to CDDP. Conclusions: These findings indicate that PGRMC1 plays an important role in promoting ovarian cancer cell viability and that attenuating PGRMC1's action makes the ovarian cancer cells more sensitive to CDDP. These data suggest that targeted depletion of PGRMC1 could be useful as an adjunct to CDDP therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据