4.0 Article

Measurement of donor-specific HLA antibodies following plasma exchange therapy predicts clinical outcome in pediatric heart and lung transplant recipients with antibody-mediated rejection

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 301-308

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jca.21270

关键词

plasmapheresis; HLA; alloantibody; DSA; transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an increasingly utilized immunosuppressive adjunct for treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) following organ transplantation. TPE works through removal of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) in the recipient's plasma. However, there is no clear laboratory measure evaluating efficacy of removal of DSAs or predicting clinical outcome. We hypothesized that semi-quantitative DSA measurement by multiplex HLA antibody immunoassay may provide qualitative and quantitative data for DSA clearance and predict treatment efficacy. To evaluate this, we retrospectively investigated DSA concentrations and clinical outcome for 21 pediatric patients who received 31 cycles of TPE peri-operatively as an adjunct treatment for transplantation in the setting of a positive cytotoxic crossmatch (CXM) and in recipients with AMR following heart or lung transplantation. Immunoassay measurement of DSAs during 15/20 cycles correlated significantly with clinical outcome in the AMR treatment group (P=0.02), demonstrating the utility of DSA measurement in predicting clinical outcome. In contrast, immunoassay correlated with clinical outcome in only 7/11 patients treated peri-operatively with TPE for CXM-positive transplantations (P=0.58). Changes in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for the DSAs correlated better with clinical response than surrogate CXM titers in a subset of patients. We conclude that semi-quantitative measurement of DSAs by immunoassay can predict clinical response to TPE for treatment of AMR is more reliable than surrogate CXM titer, and should be used to guide TPE treatment of AMR. J. Clin. Apheresis 28:301-308, 2013. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据