4.6 Article

Spinal anesthesia protects against perioperative hyperglycemia in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 455-460

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.02.001

关键词

Diabestes; General anesthesia; Hyperglycemia; Spinal anesthesia; Total hip replacement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objective: To determine whether spinal anesthesia blunts surgical stress reactions and results in less perioperative hyperglycemia. Design: Prospective, randomized controlled study. Setting: Operating room of a university hospital. Patients: 68 adult, nondiabetic (n=40) and diabetic (n=28), ASA physical status 1, 2, and 3 patients patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Interventions: General or spinal anesthesia was administered. Measurements: Blood HbA1C was measured preoperatively to identify patients with undiagnosed diabetes. Glucose levels were checked preoperatively, then immediately after, and one hour after surgery. A conventional glucose control protocol was used, where insulin was given when blood glucose concentrations exceeded 250 mg/dL. Main Results: Preoperative glucose levels in general and spinal anesthesia patients were comparable and not significantly different in nondiabetic and diabetic patients. At the end of surgery and one hour after surgery, glucose levels were significantly higher in patients undergoing general anesthesia compared with baseline values in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients (P < 0.05). In nondiabetic and diabetic patients, a significant increase in glucose level was found in patients undergoing general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia (P < 0.05). In patients receiving spinal anesthesia, glucose levels remained stable. Two diabetic patients undergoing general anesthesia received insulin. Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia attenuates the hyperglycemic response to surgical stimuli in diabetics and nondiabetic patients. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据