4.7 Article

Characteristics of Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensification over the Western North Pacific

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 31, 期 21, 页码 8917-8930

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0653.1

关键词

Hurricanes; typhoons

资金

  1. MEXT KAKENHI [17H02956, 16K13884]
  2. Kyoto University Disaster Prevention Research Institute's collaborative research program [29G-05]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H02956, 16K13884] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study statistically investigates the characteristics of tropical cyclones (TCs) undergoing rapid intensification (RI) in the western North Pacific in the 37 years from 1979 to 2015 and the relevant atmospheric and oceanic environments. Among 900 TCs, 201 TCs undergoing RI (RI-TCs) are detected by our definition as a wind speed increase of 30 kt (15.4 m s(-1)) or more in a 24-h period. RI-TCs potentially occur throughout the year, with low variation in RI-TC occurrence rate among the seasons. Conversely, the annual occurrence of RI-TC varies widely. In El Nino years, TCs tend to undergo RI mainly as a result of average locations at the time of tropical storm formation (TSF) being farther east and south, whereas TCs experience RI less frequently in La Nina years. The occurrence rates of RI-TC increased from the 1990s to the late 2000s. The RI onset time is typically 0-66 h after the TSF and the duration that satisfies the criteria of RI is 1-2 days. RI frequently occurs over the zonally elongated area around the eastern Philippine Sea. The development stage and life-span are longer in RI-TCs than in TCs that do not undergo RI. RI-TCs are small at the time of TSF and tend to develop as intense TCs as a result of environmental conditions favorable for TC development, weak vertical wind shear, high convective available potential energy, and tropical cyclone heat potential. The occurrence rates of RI-TCs that make landfall in Japan and the Philippines are higher than in China and Vietnam.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据