4.7 Article

Decadal Evolution of Ocean Thermal Anomalies in the North Atlantic: The Effects of Ekman, Overturning, and Horizontal Transport

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 698-719

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00234.1

关键词

North Atlantic Ocean; Ocean circulation; Ocean dynamics; Thermohaline circulation; Climate variability; Decadal variability

资金

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NER/T/S/2002/00439]
  2. joint DECC/DEFRA Met Office Hadley Centre Programme [GA001101]
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H02087X/1, NER/T/S/2002/00439] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [NE/H02087X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Basin-scale thermal anomalies in the North Atlantic, extending to depths of 1-2 km, are more pronounced than the background warming over the last 60 years. A dynamical analysis based on reanalyses of historical data from 1965 to 2000 suggests that these thermal anomalies are formed by ocean heat convergences, augmented by the poorly known air-sea fluxes. The heat convergence is separated into contributions from the horizontal circulation and the meridional overturning circulation (MOC), the latter further separated into Ekman and MOC transport minus Ekman transport (MOC-Ekman) cells. The subtropical thermal anomalies are mainly controlled by wind-induced changes in the Ekman heat convergence, while the subpolar thermal anomalies are controlled by the MOC-Ekman heat convergence; the horizontal heat convergence is generally weaker, only becoming significant within the subpolar gyre. These thermal anomalies often have an opposing sign between the subtropical and subpolar gyres, associated with opposing changes in the meridional volume transport driving the Ekman and MOC-Ekman heat convergences. These changes in gyre-scale convergences in heat transport are probably induced by the winds, as they correlate with the zonal wind stress at gyre boundaries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据