4.7 Review

Molecular mechanisms of memory in imprinting

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 56-69

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.013

关键词

Learning; Memory; Behavioural imprinting; IMM

资金

  1. BBSRC [S10843, BB/H018948/1]
  2. Royal Society [gt/fSU/JP]
  3. S. Rustaveli National Science Foundation [01/31]
  4. Wellcome Trust [047694/Z/96/7]
  5. Isaac Newton Trust [Gene expression in a memory system of the chick brain]
  6. BBSRC [BB/H018948/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [S18043, BB/H018948/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Converging evidence implicates the intermediate and medial mesopallium (IMM) of the domestic chick forebrain in memory for a visual imprinting stimulus. During and after imprinting training, neuronal responsiveness in the IMM to the familiar stimulus exhibits a distinct temporal profile, suggesting several memory phases. We discuss the temporal progression of learning-related biochemical changes in the IMM, relative to the start of this electrophysiological profile. c-fos gene expression increases <15 min after training onset, followed by a learning-related increase in Fos expression, in neurons immunopositive for GABA, taurine and parvalbumin (not calbindin). Approximately simultaneously or shortly after, there are increases in phosphorylation level of glutamate (AMPA) receptor subunits and in releasable neurotransmitter pools of GABA and taurine. Later, the mean area of spine synapse post-synaptic densities, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor number and phosphorylation level of further synaptic proteins are elevated. After similar to 15 h, learning-related changes in amounts of several synaptic proteins are observed. The results indicate progression from transient/labile to trophic synaptic modification, culminating in stable recognition memory. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据