4.7 Article

The Asymmetric Influence of the Two Types of El Nino and La Nina on Summer Rainfall over Southeast China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 26, 期 13, 页码 4567-4582

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00324.1

关键词

Atmosphere-ocean interaction; Atmospheric circulation; Annual variations; Anomalies; Climate variability; Interannual variability

资金

  1. 973 Program [2010CB950400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41030961]
  3. CAS Project [XDA5090403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the authors demonstrate that the two types of El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) have asymmetric features with respect to the impact of their positive and negative phases on boreal summer rainfall over the Yangtze River Valley (YRV) and South China (SC). The relationship between rainfall over the YRV and the warm pool (WP) La Nina is positive and significant, whereas the relationship with the WP El Nino is not. In the case of the cold tongue (CT) ENSO, its positive phase has a positive influence, while there is no significant relationship with the negative phase. In contrast, rainfall over SC has a significant positive relationship with WP El Nino, but a nonsignificant relationship with WP La Nina. The positive phase of the CT ENSO has a significant negative influence on SC rainfall, while the negative phase has a nonsignificant impact. An asymmetric atmospheric response to the asymmetric sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTAs) was also observed in the lower troposphere. The location of the center of the anomalous circulations over the study region differs during the opposite phases of the two types of ENSO. This asymmetric response is likely to be linked to the different spatial patterns of the two types of El Nino and La Nina. Atmospheric general circulation models confirm the authors' analysis of the observed data. Numerical simulations show that the asymmetric response of the lower atmosphere is driven mainly by differing SSTA patterns in the equatorial Pacific Ocean.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据