4.7 Article

Standing and Transient Eddies in the Response of the Southern Ocean Meridional Overturning to the Southern Annular Mode

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 25, 期 20, 页码 6958-6974

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00309.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. CEA (Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique)
  2. CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-08-JCJC-0777-01]
  4. INSU/LEFE
  5. NERC [NE/I020415/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I020415/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To refine the understanding of how the Southern Ocean responds to recent intensification of the southern annular mode (SAM), a regional ocean model at two eddy-permitting resolutions was forced with two synthetic interannual forcings. The first forcing corresponds to homogeneously intensified winds, while the second concerns their poleward intensification, consistent with positive phases of the SAM. Resulting wind-driven responses differ greatly between the nearly insensitive Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) and the more sensitive meridional overturning circulation (MOC). As expected, eddies mitigate the response of the ACC and MOC to poleward-intensified winds. However, transient eddies do not necessarily play an increasing role in meridional transport with increasing resolution. As winds and resolution increase, meridional transport from standing eddies becomes more efficient at balancing wind-enhanced overturning. These results question the current paradigms on the role of eddies and present new challenges for eddy flux parameterization. Results also indicate that spatial patterns of wind anomalies are at least as important as the overall change in intensity in influencing the Southern Ocean's dynamic response to wind events. Poleward-intensified wind anomalies from the positive trend in the SAM are far more efficient in accelerating the ACC than homogeneous wind anomalies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据