4.7 Article

Forcing Processes of the Summertime Circumglobal Teleconnection Pattern in a Dry AGCM

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 2093-2114

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2009JCLI3323.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. MEXT, Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22340135] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To better understand the predictability of the wavelike circumglobal teleconnection (COT) pattern prevailing during boreal summer, two sets of experiments are performed using a nonlinear dry atmospheric model. Each experiment consists of a 10-member ensemble of 26-yr integrations driven by the diabolic heating derived from reanalysis data: one with the monthly climatological mean heating (CLIM) and the other with the monthly heating for 1979-2004 (HIST). Both do well in reproducing the observed summer mean state, as well as the low-frequency variance distribution. The COT pattern identified in the monthly meridional wind anomalies at 200 hPa shows zonally oriented wave packets over Eurasia. The simulated COT has a nearly identical phase structure with the observations and indicates little difference between the CLIM and HIST results. While this indicates that the origin of COT lies in the internal dry dynamics, the ensemble mean of the CGT in HIST is partly controlled by the slow variation in the heating field, as indicated by the high potential predictability of the simulated COT pattern. Diagnoses using the linearized model demonstrate that the heating anomaly most responsible for the COT-like steady response is located over the eastern Mediterranean region, where the heating may be coupled with the COT pattern. In addition to the heating near the COT, remote heating and cooling anomalies over North America and equatorial Africa are found to be effective at exciting stationary Rossby waves trapped on the Atlantic and Asian jets. It is thus suggested that the mechanisms generating the heating anomalies over these regions are the key to the predictability of the COT pattern.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据