4.7 Article

Predicting the compressive strength of silica fume concrete using hybrid artificial neural network with multi-objective grey wolves

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 202, 期 -, 页码 54-64

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.065

关键词

Silica fume; Concrete; Artificial neural network; Multi-objective grey wolves optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of silica fume as a partial replacement for Ordinary Portland Cement provides a wide variety of benefits such as reduced pressure on natural resources, reduced CO2 footprint, and improved mechanical and durability properties. Compressive strength of concrete is one of the most important parameters in the design of concrete structures. Artificial Neural Network (ANN), as one of the powerful tools in the artificial intelligence field, has been widely used to predict various properties of concrete mixtures. One of the major drawbacks of the developed ANN models in predicting the concrete properties is their high complexity. In this study, estimating the compressive strength of silica fume concrete using the ANN method was considered as a two-objective optimization problem. These two objectives were the accuracy and the complexity of the developed ANN models. In this regard, a new multi-objective optimization method called Multi-Objective Grey Wolves Optimization (MOGWO) method was served to find a simple ANN model with acceptable error. After solving the optimization problem, a total number of 31 optimized ANN models were achieved. An ANN model with just one hidden layer with five neurons and the Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9617 for all data was chosen as the final ANN model. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was carried out to investigate the capability of the final ANN model in predicting the trend of the compressive strength of silica fume concrete with changing the effective variables on the compressive strength. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据