4.7 Article

Water availability footprint of milk and milk products from large-scale dairy production systems in Northeast China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 91-97

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.043

关键词

Dairy farming; Agri-food sector; Life cycle assessment; Water footprint; Sustainable water use

资金

  1. Mars Foods (China) Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As China's dairy consumption grows, both the domestic milk production and the importation of dairy products are increasing to meet demand. As a first step toward understanding the environmental impacts of water use in the expanding Chinese dairy industry, life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to calculate the water availability footprint for large-scale production systems in Heilongjiang, a major production region. Comparisons were also made with imported products from the US (California) and New Zealand. The water footprint of milk (cradle to farm gate) produced in Heilongjiang was around 11 L H(2)Oe (H2O-equivalents) kg(-1) fat-protein-corrected milk (FPCM). This compared to 461 and 0.01 L H(2)Oe kg(-1) FPCM for production in California and New Zealand respectively. Accordingly, the water footprints of milk products (cradle to factory gate) produced in Heilongjiang were much lower than those imported from California, but higher than those from New Zealand. From a food industry perspective, shifting the sourcing of dairy products from California to New Zealand or Heilongjiang could greatly reduce the associated life cycle water footprints of dairy-based processed foods. These results highlight that dairy products can be produced with minimal potential to contribute to freshwater scarcity. However, dairy production systems vary, both in production pattern and local environmental context. With the expansion of dairy farming in China, the development of farming systems with high consumptive water requirements should be avoided in water-stressed regions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据