4.7 Article

Indirect carbon emissions in household consumption: evidence from the urban and rural area in China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 94-103

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.041

关键词

Indirect energy consumption; EEF; STIRPAT model; Influencing factors

资金

  1. Program National Natural Science Foundation of China [71173017, 70773008, 71172106, 71020107026]
  2. National 973 plan project of China [2012CB955703]
  3. Nature Science Foundation of Beijing, China [9112013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resident energy consumption can be divided into direct and indirect parts, and the indirect part is often considered to be much more important than direct part by some scholars. In this paper, on the basis of Consumer Lifestyle Approach (CLA) and the estimation of Net Primary Productivity (NPP), Energy Ecological Footprint (EEF) of indirect energy consumption is calculated using statistical data of Chinese urban and rural areas from 1999 to 2010. And then, improved STIRPAT (Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence and Technology) model is used to empirically study the influences of urbanization level, economic level, Engel coefficient, energy intensity and industry structure on indirect energy consumption. Given the consideration of potential multicollinearity, the model is estimated using partial least square (PLS) regression. The results indicate that, for urban residents, the EEF of indirect energy use is on the rise. It is positively influenced by urbanization level, per capita income and the ratio of tertiary industry, but negatively influenced by Engel coefficient and energy intensity. For rural residents, the EEF is declining. It is positively influenced by Engel coefficient, energy intensity and tertiary industry proportion, while negatively influenced by urbanization level and per capita income. Combining these empirical findings and China's specific circumstances, some policy recommendations are made. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据