4.7 Article

Co-benefit evaluation for urban public transportation sector a case of Shenyang, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 82-91

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.034

关键词

Co-benefits; Greenhouse gas; Air pollutants; Public transportation; Cost; Urban area

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71033004, 712111042, 41101126]
  2. Ministry of Science and technology [2011BAJ06B01, 2011DFA91810]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [2008-318]
  4. United Nations University's Cobenefits Project
  5. Green Talents Program under Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Buses and taxies are the most widely used vehicles for urban public transportation in developing countries. They contribute significantly to the emissions of greenhouse gas and air pollutants. Policy makers consider the introduction of new emissions standard vehicles and alternative fuel vehicles in bus and taxi fleets as an attractive measure for reducing the emissions of greenhouse gas and air pollutants. It is important to understand the environmental benefits and economic challenges involved in fleet conversion. However, few studies have been conducted, especially in developing countries. This study analyzes the cost effectiveness and environmental benefits of various vehicles by employing a case study in Shenyang, China. The results showed that CNG bus has the best overall economic and environmental performances, while diesel car is one possible choice for taxi selection when considering the current technology level. Although direct emissions are lower for both hybrid and electricity vehicles, embodied emissions are higher, plus higher costs, making them not suitable as public transportation tools, at least for the current stage. In order to further improve co-benefits in public transportation sector, an integrated effort is needed, including the gradual phase-out of inefficient vehicles, green vehicle purchase, infrastructure improvement and capacity-building initiatives. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据