4.7 Article

Environmental impact of screenhouse and open-field cultivation using a life cycle analysis: the case study of green bean production

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 63-69

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.006

关键词

Life cycle analysis; Green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.); Environmental impact; Screenhouse; Misting

资金

  1. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion Agraria (INIA) [RTA2006-00062]
  2. IFAPA
  3. EU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The social demand for environmentally friendly agricultural production requires technologies that help preserve the environment under sustainable criteria whilst providing high-quality products that guarantee food safety. This study evaluates the environmental damages attributed to different alternatives for screenhouse as well as open-field cropping systems for green beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) during their life cycle by applying the life cycle analysis (LCA) in an inland area of the province of Granada, Spain, during two spring autumn crop cycles (2008 and 2009). The aim of this evaluation was to select and improve the cultivation techniques, equipment, and structures by trying to minimize their impact on the surroundings and natural resources. The green bean cropping systems analysed were: a screenhouse (S), a screenhouse equipped with a misting system (SM), and a control (open-field, OF). The stages considered in the LCA study were the infrastructure and the crop cycle. The OF treatment showed the greatest environmental impact in most categories due to its lower yields. Under our experimental conditions, the misting system was justified (from the environmental standpoint) providing the yields were higher than those obtained without the misting (S). All the treatments in 2009 produced a greater impact than in 2008 due to climatic conditions that sharply reduced production. The LCA study has shown the importance of reaching a minimum yield to justify the environmental impact of different treatments. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据