4.7 Article

Estimation of the variability in global warming potential of worldwide crop production using a modular extrapolation approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 31, 期 -, 页码 106-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.005

关键词

Climate change; Carbon footprint; Variability; Crop production; Life cycle assessment; Extrapolation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The agri-food sector, and specifically agricultural production, is a major contributor to climate change. In order to manage the impact on the climate, a better understanding of the variability of global warming potential in agriculture is needed. This study assesses the variability in global warming potential of 27 crops using the modular extrapolation of agricultural life cycle assessment (MEXALCA) method, a modular, geographical extrapolation method for crop life cycle assessment. The global warming potential results, excluding land use change, were validated with crop data from the ecoinvent database and from the literature. The production weighted worldwide mean values of global warming potential for the 27 crops varied in a wide range (factor of 20 in impact per ha; factor of 100 in impact per kg). The global warming potential values per kg of fresh mass were lowest for sugar crops (<0.05 kg CO2-eq kg(-1)), followed by root crops (<0.15 kg CO2-eq kg(-1)), vegetables and fruits (<0.35 kg CO2-eq kg(-1)), and oil palm. Cereals (except rice), pulses, rapeseed and soybean had medium values (<0.6 kg CO2-eq kg(-1)). Highest values were found for treenuts, other oil crops (linseed, cotton, peanuts), and rice (1.2-2.4 kg CO2-eq kg(-1)). The global warming potential per kg fresh mass was negatively correlated with the mean yield of the different crops, but not in the case of the same crop produced in different countries. The farming intensity in different countries, the yields and the selection of producing countries were important contributory factors in determining the variability of global warming potential. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据