4.7 Article

Scenarios in selected tools for environmental systems analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 16, 期 18, 页码 1958-1970

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.01.008

关键词

Environmental assessment; Environmental management; Life cycle assessment; Cost-benefit analysis; Input-output analysis; System of economic and environmental accounts; Forecasts; Predictive scenarios; External scenarios; Normative scenarios; Backcasting

资金

  1. MISTRA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of different tools for analysing environmental impacts of different systems have been developed. These include procedural tools such as strategic environmental assessment (SEA) and environmental management systems (EMS) as well as analytical ones such as life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC), cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and the system of economic and environmental accounts (SEEA) including input-output analysis (IOA). Descriptions or scenarios of the future are typically relevant elements in these tools, since they are often used to describe impacts in the future. For futures studies a number of different approaches and techniques have been developed. In an earlier paper we have presented a typology of different types of scenarios that respond to different types of questions. These include predictive scenarios, explorative scenarios and normative scenarios. The aim of this paper is to explore connections between selected tools for environmental systems analysis and different scenario types. Although there is a clear need for futures studies in several tools for environmental systems analysis, it is interesting to note that the literature on methodologies for and case studies of combinations of futures studies and environmental systems analysis tools is rather limited. This suggests that there is a need for further research in this area including both methodoloy and practical case studies. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据