4.6 Article

EXPLORING CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

期刊

JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 337-348

出版社

VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
DOI: 10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.337-348

关键词

critical success factors (CSFs); stakeholder management; construction projects; rankings and groupings; Hong Kong

资金

  1. Hong Kong Polytechnic University and the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [PolyU 52644/06E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

suggested in the literature. It is crucial to explore the relative importance and groupings of these factors. This paper aims to identify CSFs associated with stakeholder management in construction projects, and explore their ranking and underlying relationship. 15 CSFs were identified through a literature review, and consolidated by interviews and pilot studies with professionals in construction industry. A questionnaire instrument containing these 15 CSFs was sent out to project managers in Hong Kong, and 183 completed questionnaires were retrieved. The top three ranked factors for stakeholder management were managing stakeholders with social responsibilities, assessing the stakeholders' needs and constraints to the project, and communicating with stakeholders properly and frequently. Using factor analysis and considering the high importance of the factor managing stakeholders with social responsibilities, the 15 CSFs were grouped into five dimensions namely, precondition factor, stakeholder estimation, information inputs, decision making, and sustainable support. All these five groupings and their relationship were included in a framework for successful stakeholder management in construction projects. These findings help to clarify what the high prioritized factors are, and could also be used as an assessment tool to evaluate the performance of stakeholder management and thus help to identify areas for improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据