4.5 Article

Rapid determination of sixteen sulfonylurea herbicides in surface water by solid phase extraction cleanup and ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.09.028

关键词

Sulfonylurea herbicides; Surface water; Ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography; Tandem mass spectrometry; Solid phase extraction

资金

  1. Jiangsu Province Environmental Monitoring Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sensitive and very fast analytical method has been developed for the simultaneous quantification of sixteen sulfonylurea herbicides in surface water. An ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method with solid phase extraction for sample cleanup has been developed for screening sixteen sulfonylurea herbicides (oxasulfuron, thifensulfuron-methyl, cinosulfuron, metsulfuron methyl, sulfometuron methyl, triasulfuron, rimsulfuron, ethametsulfuron methyl, sulfosulfuron, tribenuron methyl, bensulfuron methyl, iodosulfuron methyl, pyrazosulfuron ethyl, prosulfuron, chlorimuron ethyl, ethoxysulfuron) in water samples simultaneously within 12 min. Water samples were acidified, and the target herbicides were extracted by passing through ProElut C18 extraction cartridges. After drying by nitrogen flow, the cartridges were eluted with elution solvents, and the eluate was then evaporated to dryness, redissolved and analyzed. The mobile phase composed of 0.02% formic acid and acetonitrile using gradient elution. A triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source operated in the positive ion with selective reaction monitoring mode. Each of the analytes in all the samples was monitored using protonated molecule and its two characteristic fragment ions for confirmation. The limits of detection for all analytes were below 1.0 ng/mL, except for sulfosulfuron and prosulfuron, and limits of quantitation were between 1 and 8 ng/mL for this method. Three water types were used for the validation of the method. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据