4.5 Article

Development of an off-line capillary column IMAC phosphopeptide enrichment method for label-free phosphorylation relative quantification

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.08.035

关键词

IMAC; Label-free; Phosphopeptide enrichment; Relative quantification; RPLC-MS/MS

资金

  1. Korean Systems Biology Research [M105030100001-05N030100110]
  2. Basic Science Research Program [NRF 2011-0027314]
  3. Mid-career Researcher Program [20080060838]
  4. NRF [KRF-2008-314-000265]
  5. MEST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) and metal oxide type affinity chromatography (MOAC) techniques have been widely used for mass spectrometry-based phosphorylation analysis. Unlike MOAC techniques, IMAC requires rather complete removals of buffering reagents, salts and high concentrations of denaturant prior to sample loading in order for the successful enrichment of phosphopeptides. In this study, a simple off-line capillary column-based I MAC phosphopeptide enrichment method can shorten sample preparation time by eliminating the speed-vac step from the desalting process. Tryptic digest peptide samples containing 2 M urea can be directly processed and the entire IMAC procedure can be completed within Oh. When tryptic digest peptide samples prepared from mouse whole brain tissues were analyzed using our method, an average of 249 phosphoproteins and 463 unique phosphopeptides were identified from single 2-h RPLC-MS/MS analysis (similar to 88% specificity). An additional advantage of this method is the significantly improved reproducibility of the phosphopeptide enrichment results. When four independent phosphopeptide enrichment experiments were carried out, the peak areas of phosphopeptides identified among four enrichment experiments were relatively similar (less than 16.2% relative standard dev.). Because of this increased reproducibility, relative phosphorylation quantification analysis of major phosphoproteins appears to be feasible without the need for stable isotope labeling techniques. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据