4.5 Article

Analysis of neurotrophins in human serum by immunoaffinity capillary electrophoresis (ICE) following traumatic head injury

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.10.022

关键词

CE; Head trauma; Immunoaffinity; Neurotrophins; Serum

资金

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurotrophins, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), neutrotrophin-3 (NT-3), neurotrophin-4 (NT-4). anti beta-nerve growth factor (beta-NGF), play an active role in the development. maintenance and survival of cells of the central nervous system (CNS). Previous research has indicated that a decrease in concentrations of these neurotrophins is often associated with cell death and ultimately patient demise. However, much of the research conducted analyses of samples taken directly from the CNS, ie., of samples that are not readily available in clinical trauma centers. In an attempt to obtain a method for evaluating neurotrophins in a more readily accessible matrix, i.e. serum, a precise and accurate immunoaffinity capillary electrophoresis (ICE) method was developed and applied to measure neurotrophins in serum from patients with various degrees of head injury. The five neurotrophins of interest were extracted and concentrated by specific immunochemically immobilized antibodies. bound directly to the capillary wall, and eluted and separated in approximately 10 min. NT-3, BDNF. CNTF and beta-NGF showed a marked decrease in concentration as the severity of the head injury increased: mild versus severe: 91% decrease tot NT-3; 93 % decrease for BDNF; 93 % decrease for CNTF, and a 87% decrease for beta-NGF. This decrease in concentration is consistent with the neuro-protective roles that neurotrophins play in the maintenance and survival of neuronal cells. The results obtained by the ICE method were closely comparable with those generated by a commercially available ELISA method. Published by Elsevier B V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据