4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Validation and application of an LC-MS/MS method for quantitation of three fatty acid ethanolamides as biomarkers for fatty acid hydrolase inhibition in human plasma

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.04.024

关键词

Biomarker; Quantitation; LC-MS/MS; Ethanolamides; Fatty acid amide hydrolase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endogenous ethanolamides (fatty acid amides). including arachidonyl ethanolamide (anandamide, AEA), oleoyl ethanolamide (OEA), and palmitoyl ethanolamide (PEA), are substrates of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) FAAH may play an important role for pain, anxiety/depression, and metabolic disorders Ethanolamides are considered to be potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers to determine target engagement for FAAH inhibition by novel pharmaceutical agents A highly selective. sensitive. and high-throughput liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for simultaneous quantitation of AEA. OEA, and PEA in human plasma The method employed D(4)-AEA, D(4)-OEA, and (13)C(2)-PEA as surrogate analytes to establish the concentration-mass response relationship. i e. a regression equation The concentrations of AEA, OEA, and PEA were calculated based on the regression equations derived from the surrogate analytes. This approach made it possible to prepare calibration standard and quality control (QC) samples in plasma devoid of interferences from the endogenous analytes The analytical methodology required 150 mu L of human plasma that was processed via liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) using a 96-well plate format Chromatographic separation was achieved with a revel sed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column using gradient elution, and the run time was 3 min The method was fully validated and it demonstrated acceptable accuracy, precision, linearity, and specificity The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 0 1/0 5/0 5 ng/mL for AEA/OEA/PEA, which was sensitive enough to capture the basal plasma levels in healthy subjects Bench-top stability in plasma, freeze-thaw stability in plasma, frozen long-term stability in plasma, autosampler stability. and stock solution stability all met acceptance criteria (%Bias within +/- 12 0%) Characterization of stability in purchased/aged blood indicated that ethanolamides are subject to degradation mediated by intracellular membrane-bound FAAH. which has been shown to be inhibited by phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) In the presence of PMSF, ethanolamide levels increased slightly over time, suggesting that blood cells release ethanolamides into plasma. Whole blood stability conducted in fresh blood immediately following collection revealed that there was significant elevation of ethanolamide concentrations (similar to 1 3-2 0-fold on ice and similar to 1 5-3.0-fold at room temperature by 2 h), indicating that de novo synthesis and release from blood cells were the predominant factors affecting ethanolamide concentrations ex vivo Accordingly, conditions that ensured rapid separation of plasma from blood cells and consistency in the blood harvesting procedures were established and implemented for clinical studies to minimize the ex vivo elevation of plasma ethanolamide concentrations. The variability (ultra-subject and inter-subject) of plasma ethanolamide levels was evaluated in healthy subjects during a Phase 0 study (no drug administration) that simulated the design of single-ascending dose and multiple-ascending close clinical trials in terms of sample collection time points. population, food, and activity The data Indicated there was relatively large inter- and intra-subject variation in plasma ethanolamide concentrations In addition, apparent variations due to rime of day and/or food effects were also revealed Understanding the variability of ethanolamide levels in humans is very important for study design and data inerpretation when changes in ethanolamide levels are used as target engagement biomarkers in clinical trials Published by Elsevier B V

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据