4.5 Article

Quantification of protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in dried blood spots by liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.04.003

关键词

antiretroviral; HIV; therapeutic drug monitoring; TDM; LC-MS; chromatography; mass spectrometry; dried blood spots; dried blood spot; bioanalysis; pharmacokinetics; protease inhibitors; non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase; inhibitors; atazanavir; darunavir; lopinavir; ritonavir; efavirenz; nevirapine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A bioanalytical method for the determination of most commonly prescribed protease inhibitors (atazanavir, darunavir, lopinavir and ritonavir) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (efavirenz and nevirapine) was developed and validated according to FDA guidelines. In brief, dried blood spots were punched out of a collection paper with a 0.25 in. diameter punch. The analytes were extracted from the punched-out disc using a mixture of acetonitrile, methanol and 0.2M zinc sulphate in water (1:1:2, v/v/v) containing the internal standards dibenzepine, 13C6-efavirenz and D5-saquinavir. 20 mu L of the extract was injected onto the reversed-phase C18 column (150 mm x 2.0 mm) for separation from endogenous compounds and the analytes were quantified using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The analytical run time was only 10 min. Validated concentration ranges covered the ranges encountered in routine clinical practice. The assay was linear over the concentration ranges tested (0.1-20 mg/L for atazanavir, lopinavir, nevirapine and efavirenz and 0.05-10 mg/L for darunavir and ritonavir). Accuracies and inter- and intra-run precisions at all levels ranged from 96.2 to 113.9% and 3.1 to 13.3%, respectively. Analytes in dried blood spots were stable for at least 7 days at 30 degrees C. The method enabled patient-friendly sample collection, easy and cheap sample shipment and non-hospital based sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据