4.6 Article

Facile synthesis of magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers and its application in magnetic solid phase extraction for fluoroquinolones in milk samples

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1329, 期 -, 页码 17-23

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.12.083

关键词

Magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers; Magnetic solid phase extraction; Milk samples; High performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detector; Fluoroquinolones

资金

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB910702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91017013, 91217309, 21005057]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M511653]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we proposed a simple co-mixing method to fabricate magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers (magnetic MIPs). MIPs were commercial products while magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were prepared by chemical oxidation and solvothermal methods. When MNPs and MIPs (with mass ratio 1:1) were co-mixed and vortexed evenly in methanol, they could assemble into magnetic composites spontaneously and thus be magnetically separable. To testify the feasibility of the magnetic composites in sample preparation, the resultant magnetic MIPs were applied as sorbents for magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) of fluoroquinolones (FQs) in milk samples. Under optimized conditions, a rapid, convenient, and efficient method for the determination of three FQs in milk samples was established by magnetic MIPs based MSPE coupling with high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detector (HPLC-UV). The limits of detection (LODs) for three FQs were found to be 1.8-3.2 ng/g. The intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations (RSDs) were less than 9.5% and 12.5%, respectively. The recoveries of FQs for two spiked milk samples were in the range from 94.0% to 124.4% with the RSDs less than 11.6%. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据