4.6 Article

Optimization study for metabolomics analysis of human sweat by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in high resolution mode

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1333, 期 -, 页码 70-78

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.01.071

关键词

Metabolomics; Global profiling; Human sweat; LC-MS/MS; Human sweat metabolome; Liquid chromatography

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO)
  2. FEDER Program [CTQ2012-37428]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) [RYC-2009-03921]
  4. MICINN [AP2009-0499]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sweat has recently gained popularity as a potential tool for diagnostics and biomarker monitoring as it is a non-invasive biofluid the composition of which could be modified by certain pathologies, as is the case with cystic fibrosis, which increases chloride levels in sweat. The aim of the present study was to develop an analytical method for analysis of human sweat by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-Q-TOF MS/MS) in high resolution mode. Thus, different sample preparation strategies and different chromatographic modes (HILIC and C18 reverse modes) were compared to check their effect on the profile of sweat metabolites. Forty-one compounds-were identified by the MS/MS information obtained with a mass tolerance window below 4 ppm. Amino acids, dicarboxylic acids and other interesting metabolites such as inosine, choline, uric acid and tyramine were identified. Among the tested protocols, direct analysis after dilution was a suited option to obtain a representative snapshot of sweat metabolome. In addition, sample clean up by 08 SpinColumn SPE cartridges improved the sensitivity of most identified compounds and reduced the number of interferents. As most of the identified metabolites are involved in key biochemical pathways, this study opens new possibilities to the use of sweat as a source of metabolite biomarkers of specific disorders. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据