4.6 Article

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry determination of earthy-musty odorous compounds in waters by two phase hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction using polyvinylidene fluoride fibers

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1329, 期 -, 页码 45-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.01.002

关键词

Hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction; Polyvinylidene fluoride; Odorous compounds; Waters; Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Guangdong Medical Scientific Research Foundation [B2010027, B2012021]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [S2012010009877]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81302470]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A rapid and sensitive method for the determination of earthy-musty odorous compounds, 2-methylisoborneol, 2-isopropyl-3-methoxy pyrazine, 2,4,6-trichloroanisole, 2,3,6-trichloroanisole, and geosmin, in water samples has been developed. The method was based on coupling a new polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction system with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The PVDF hollow fibers have high porosity and an enhanced solvent compatibility for extraction of the target analytes. Experimental conditions were optimized by investigating the type of extraction solvent, sample pH, sodium chloride concentration, stirring speed, extraction time, and GC-MS conditions. Under optimized conditions, the earthy-musty odorous compounds exhibited good linearity (R > 0.995) in the concentration range of 6.2-250 ng/L. The repeatability and reproducibility of the method were lower than 6.8% and 9.8%, respectively. The limit of detection and limit of quantification values were lower than 2.0 and 6.2 ng/L, respectively. The analysis of different water samples such as tap, pond, rive and waste water indicated minimal matrix effects. Analyte recoveries for real samples spiked at different concentrations were between 84.4% and 117.5%. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据